HOW DO I MAP OBJ DATA TO FMA CONCEPT

Background

 * If artist determine what item to model from the list of FMA_ID, the world is easy.
 * In modelling processes, medical illustrations and model objects ( anatomical plastics models for education ), and Textbook descriptions are the main sources for information.
 * In general, terminology use in different sources varies in granularity and nomenclature system very much.
 * For modellers, it is much easier to name the file as source says while modelling.
 * Accordingly, obj files submitted by artists have files names which is heterogenous and somewhat context dependent.

Process

 * 1) Obtain folder name and file names which artist have provided.
 * 2) Appreciate the AIM of one folder (a set of obj submitted together).
 * 3) *ex) modeller use the skeleton as coordination. Accordingly, if skeleton in modified somehow, not only the musclature but all the items should be modified according to the.
 * 4) *ex)Model still have many systems missing such as periferal nerves, inner ear, lymphatic systems etc.
 * 5) Look at the file name and map it to FMA.
 * 6) expand the abbrebiation : modeller need to type in the file names, there are many abbrebiations such as r. l. mid. lat. add. abd. m. n. etc.
 * 7) map the name to FMA dictionary if they look good.
 * 8) If the name is not identified by the FMA dictionary
 * 9) Misspelling
 * 10) wrong word arrangement ( xx of right xxx xxx )
 * 11) no corresponding concepts in FMA.
 * 12) Modeller usually make one-side model assuming the mirror image generation afterword. But some FMA entities do  not have right left discrimination.
 * 13) Modeller used one item in pieces sometimes. These guys are usually named item1, item2, item3.
 * 14) Check the morphology and determine how to deal.
 * 15) If objects are bones and muscles the modeller started to model using ORIGO-INSERTIO table as cited. So, I do not check the relations seriously, only typographical file name errors.
 * 16) If objects are internal organ with complexity in items, I look at the morphology to see if the modeller understand the definition of the items correctly.
 * 17) If there seems no sign of misunderstanding, I check only a few important relations among items and important sizes.